No, really it's all motorbike related pretty much, it's just a hodge-podge mix of things if you will. So, what's contained within this blog post. Things that rev bikes up to things that rev biker men up so to speak. That's a weird lead in, but there wasn't a better intro than that honestly. So, let's just jump in, right? I do not claim to be the end all-know all expert in anything mechanical. While I know cars pretty well, I'm no expert by any stretch of the word. I know autos, because that's what I've dismantled and worked on mechanically, and the vehicles that I've been exposed to my entire life. Vehicles, I suppose is a good, general term, because really it's cars and trucks, mainly classic. I really know absolutely nothing about motorbikes except there's a clutch, they can be one or two person, they have two wheels (mostly), and they can be heavy to hold up. I don't know how to ride one, nor do I know how to work on them, and just from this picture there's not a lot of components that I can pick out. There's the tail pipe, wheels and tires, fenders, seat, handlebars, headlight, taillight, kickstand, somehow the handles twist and make it go... or also slow up? I'm guessing the shiny silver is the engine, and the fuel tank is that red part. There's some struts. I know it wouldn't be too drastically different from a car, so I'm sure there are spark plugs and gaskets all up in there somewhere. There'd need to be a battery, there's somewhere to check and add oil and transmission fluid. Something is going to be the transmission, and something's going to be the clutch. There'd probably be brake pads and brake fluid, surely. And I'm tired of trying to list things it might have in common with a car. So, no knowledge or expertise in motorbikes. I just know I've always liked them. And because I like them and when something sparks me to write something about them, I do and will. First off is that bike up there, which is not my picture, and from research online I believe to be an early model Triumph Bonneville. But, I'll totally admit that I could be completely wrong about that, except it being pre late 1980s and being a Triumph. This was the closest I found that resembled the bike I drove past. I couldn't tell you what type of bike that is, though I learned terms only because of watching The Motorbike Show, things like Cafe Racer, Bobber, Scrambler, etc. I already knew the term Chopper. But I don't know what that Triumph is up there. A Tracker? Anyways. This black and red Triumph, or one extremely similar, is one I've seen in town twice. It sticks out like a sore thumb among a sea of modern Harley's with wind screens and big bubble bodies. Which is not a look that I like in a motorbike. I've also realized that the more it looks like a wasp, I won't like it either, because well, it looks like a wasp. Or as The Sister and I like to call them, Jefferson Starships (yes the band, but really it's a Supernatural reference). We feel that calling out, "There's a Jefferson Starship!" doesn't make the wasp or hornet fly towards us or turn and glare at us, as opposed to when we actually say the W or H words. But getting back to the topic at hand. So, this Triumph, why is it even important? It's exactly the type of motorbike that I like, and it's also one you won't really ever see where I live. Remember that I said it stuck out like a sore thumb? It's almost like walking around in throngs of clothed people and then you happen to see a person who's completely naked. You're going to notice that. I'm not going to want to see a naked person out and about, but I am going to want to see this bike and more like it. I get excited over weird things. I get excited over fungi, moss, kittens, rain clouds, and classic cars, trucks, and motorbikes... especially if that motorbike doesn't look like a Jefferson Starship. There was going to be an "or..." but there is no "or..." to add. I don't care if it is a Harley. If it's old (which they aren't here), I'm still going to be excited. After first spotting this motorbike in a parking lot, the next day there was one for sale in my neighbourhood. But it's a newer Harley with a bubble body and wind screen. Not interested, but it is interesting that there's a motorbike for sale in my neighbourhood. That's not a thing that happens, if you couldn't guess. Which moves me on to this picture, or the thing that helps rev up a motorbike, because without power (I suppose they also have an alternator to go with their starter?) you'll be going no where fast. I happened to be in the automotive section the other day and this was on the cheque out counter there. It was the tiniest, cutest battery I'd ever seen. It was the Marzipan of batteries (our cat, Marzipan is super tiny, so anything super tiny is the Marzipan of __________)!! I reached out to pick it up and make sure it was real. I could lift this battery with one hand, easy peasy. Then I notice that on the box are a picture of a motorbike and a moped. Makes sense. Motorbikes (and mopeds) aren't very large and a battery's got to go somewhere. I just never thought much about the battery and that it would need to be tiny, until this day. And before you wonder, no, oil and batteries and such for lawn mowers and water craft are not with the car and truck batteries, so there was no need for me to search out the section for these things. I'd only seen a lawn mower battery once, and while smaller than a small car battery, it's much larger than this. And I only happened to see that things were made specially for jet skis and motorboats and the like when I had to look on that isle for something else. Anyways, I can't pick up car batteries. It's a two handed job and since I can't move it with my thigh muscles, I can't lift them at all. I'd written in a previous post, because I'd been watching The Motorbike Show (and learning things), that I'd much rather work on a motorbike than a car because it seemed so much easier and therefor more enjoyable. This right here proves that, man! Look how tiny that battery is. I could work on one (a motorbike) alone, physically speaking. That cuts down on the headache of tinkering considerably. Just another plus added to my mental list. And this leads to my last point in this post, the thing that apparently revs motorbike guys up. I use Pinterest and don't really search things out, but just repin whatever comes through that's interesting to me. I have a board all about mechanical vehicles; submarines, airplanes, trains, classic cars/trucks, as well as motorbikes.
Pinterest does this algorithm thing where if you pin say a recipe about chicken, it'll show you more things like what you just pinned. If it's windows (yes, I have a board dedicated to windows that I like) you're pinning, you'll see more of those. So, you can guess that with motorbikes, it'll just show you more motorbikes, as well as things related to that subject. However, after pinning motorbikes randomly for a few years now, in the span of one day last week, those two images suddenly came through in my feed as being related to the topic and something I might be interested in. I get that guys dig sex, and they like girls to be sexy, especially on top of (literally) or pertaining to a thing they also find sexy. Think girl sprawled across the hood of a car. It's a double wammy for a straight car guy, I suppose. So, I get it, in a round-about way. They want sexy girls on the thing they think is sexy, in this case, the motorbike. I don't really understand the whole being attracted to women and wanting to be all up behind them... but then I'm not a guy. It's even a weird thing that scientists are even trying to figure out. Not really why men would be attracted to women's asses or want to have sex with them from behind. I wouldn't want to do a girl from behind, because I'd have to pass unsavoury parts. Ya know, the exit where you don't want to be anywhere near (or I would assume) because germs and gross and messy and just ick! I do hear tell that people like this part of the body, and not just to slap, and I just can't wrap my head around that. Y'all, that's just not a part that one can ever really get clean. Biology is gross and hot soapy showers still don't make that place 100% clean. But then, I suppose, more people would probably not have sex if they laid it out all logically and biologically since it isn't very pretty. So I guess it really is just a go with the flow sort of thing, and perhaps in the throws of passion neither I, nor other women, would think this was an unsavoury sexual position. I don't know as I'm still on the logical and biological side of things here. I've had a lot of time to learn and dissect and wonder, instead of the actual jumping on board sort of deal. I'm getting off topic. No, the scientific study is about but why men also like breasts and women's lips. The scientific theory that's winning out is that basically when humans started walking upright, the females still had to be sexually attractive to the males, so evolution basically recreated our sexual organs up top and up front. So, basically our breasts and cleavage resemble our asses and our lips resemble our vaginal lips. Gross. I'm fine with having girl parts, since I'm a girl, but knowing that evolution basically made us look like sex on our faces, just for men, is rather off-putting to me. It's still just a theory, but it's awkward. I really would have thought this instinct of mounting from behind would have faded out, but perhaps the instinct is still there and it's involuntary to want women no matter which way? I don't know. As I said, I'm not a guy, so I can't really wrap my head around these things. I don't have the exact feelings about the same places and the same which-ways and where-for's. But then, I'd like to see the numbers on this. Because I could understand that evolution might recreate my sexual organs up top, in order to continue the species. So males of our species would still be sexually interested in us in order for copulation and fertilization to happen. However, if that theory really holds any water, then evolutionarily speaking, mounting from behind would have died out, because there is no need. Yet, that hasn't happened. Or has it and I'm just not seeing the numbers (or else the scientists aren't running those numbers)? Like are all human males still sexually attracted to human females from behind? Or have the numbers shifted, so that only some men still stand at attention for this? If so, I could see how the scientists could feasibly form a theory like the one I've supplied above. Because evolutionarily, that desire is dying out? So, I'm interested and want to understand, which is why I read up on scientific theories on this and a myriad of other subjects. If y'all were even wondering why I'm not a sexually active gal, this is it right here? I'm way too Mr. Spock for all of it. I look for the science and logic and probability in something that is wrapped up in instinct. But then I'm also not standing by some guy that gets my motor running, with both of us feeling that magnetic pull to get as close as we can possibly get to each other. Until that day comes, then it's all science here baby. All science and no passion. But still not being a guy, so not wanting to have sex with women, I can't see the appeal of these images. If I were going to sleep with someone, it would be a man, which means I dig guy parts, but does that mean I want to see naked men on motorbikes or classic cars? Or have them stand with their leg up and socks or other things shoved into the crotches of their pants to accentuate their guy parts? Or wear cod pieces for the same effect? No, it does not. Not even this guy, who's really the only person on this planet that I find pretty. It makes me laugh to think of him (or hell any guy) in similar situations. I do think he's sexy and beyond gorgeous, but it would be ridiculous to have him scantily dressed and posing sexily on top of or with a motorbike. And while I can't find the appeal of a sexy person on a sexy mechanical object, I at least can see it's a thing that guys like. However, lets take a look at those photo's more closely for a second. Why do they bother me? It's not the "sexiness", it's the improbability of the situations. I know that's not what porn is for. It's not logical. But that's where my mind goes first. No woman in the history of ever would ride a motorbike bare assed or with most of her ass hanging out. Why? It was be extremely uncomfortable. You know that first girl (the real one, not the illustration) doesn't go around with her short jean shorts worn like that. With the crotch shoved up into the folds and slits of her girl parts because it's uncomfortable and hurts. That seat is also not velvet and she's going to sweat because in between legs on anyone is going to get sweaty and gross and she's going to be sticking to that seat and if she slides on that seat it's not going to be pleasant. Think sliding down a Slip-n-Slide without water. There's going to be uncomfortable friction and sticking while the denim material stays put. Ouch. The illustrated girl is either wearing absolutely nothing or a thong and honestly I don't know how girls wear thongs, they can't honestly be comfortable wearing them, but she's going to have a worse time than the first girl. I do unsterstand that's not what these images are about. I totally understand that the guy is first getting off because it's a motorbike and then getting off because it's a girls ass and sex and yes let's do this. And the other is all but saying, "Come on fuck me from behind because you like that and I'm sexy on this bike." Besides the fact that it's making women into nothing but depositories for man parts and jizz and just for sex, but that's a completely different topic for a completely different day. But, I'm sorry, I just don't understand this. And really it's because the situation is ridiculous. I could understand more a girl whose dressed sexily, but could also feasibly ride that motorbike that's she's getting on to (so tight fitting pants and a crop top? Perhaps her breast are showing a little from underneath? Or it's a top where she's got a lot of cleavage showing?). It's sexy and logical and real. Honestly you would think it was ridiculous if it were a guy in scanty jean shorts hiked up into his butt, posing next to a motorbike. Or a guy in nothing but a cod piece, mounted on that bike and leaning backwards to thrust his man junk out even more. You would think women were weird and stupid and you wouldn't understand the image. However, if it were a guy in jeans and a t-shirt just sitting on the motorbike or a guy wearing those clothes in the process of mounting the bike, you might see the validity of a girl thinking that's a major turn on. Why? Because the guy could actually ride the bike he's apparently about to ride. It's probable. It makes sense. It's logical. (and a lot can be said, sexy wise, about a basic look like jeans and a t-shirt). And while you might not think a guy is sexy, you could see how a girl would think the image of this type of a guy on a bike could be sexy. Plus you might even want to be more like that "sexy" guy on that bike (or want girls to see you like this same guy). I saw some pictures of a girl with short, jaw-lenghth hair in leathers (not a cat suit, I saw that too, with her shoving her butt out at the camera, yeah not her), just sitting on a bike or standing next to it, helmet under one arm. She was cool. I wanted to be that girl on a motorbike. I could also see how this image could be really, really sexy. It was sexy and it was something I thought was perfectly logical and I'd want to be that girl. It goes both ways guys. So, I don't have problems with your porn. It's a thing, it's out there. Guys like that sort of thing. Just make it realistic for christ's sake. If you wouldn't lay naked on the hood of a car or sit bare assed on a bike seat, then no one else is going to want to do that in reality either. And it just makes everything real weird, real quick.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorA girl from South Mississippi who finds herself in exploration. Archives
November 2019
Categories |